[Letter MRAX administrators, who do not reach them, the office has not deigned to communicate. This did not prevent the "CA" to respond (!??). Which referred to an article by Sam Touzani and Mohamed Belmaïzi treating convergence of interests between the extreme right Flemish and Moroccan rule and published on the site MRAX. Article censored and replaced by a Chair's text Bouhlal, much more favorable to Morocco.]
The
09/11/2005 Dear President, dear Radwan,
Dear board members of Mrax,
Dear members of staff Mrax
It is with regret we allow ourselves to be outraged before your noble and vital association.
your organization to the public interest and historic reputation based on a true ethics to denounce all forms of racism and fanaticism, we seem to navigate these days, around reefs ideological unfathomable. Mechanics calculations and unsustainable, identified by it, by then ... This
some signs that concerns are not fooling anyone, but we hope with all my heart remain in boxes among trifles without influences on the true guideline of your battle is ours and that of the entire civil society has unequivocally the role of adjuvant capital. It remains an estimable power-cons, potential excess, and you're a part.
We now see that this power-cons in which we must enter to complete our struggles, becomes increasingly compromised. For the red lines have been so interfered in the imaginations of some of your members, it becomes difficult and inappropriate to the cross.
The first line consists in the critical red states that flirt with xenophobia and racism, and in our case of the Moroccan state. From the outset, the reluctance to publish in your site, that met our article ("unholy alliance, Vlaams Belang / Moroccan State ..."), and then the fate of non-visibility that you have inflicted on the pretext it was the shadow in your activities, we suggest and hear whispers sponsors.
What happened to a group that campaigns against racism and xenophobia, not retain an article which processes and analyzes rightly below the sneaky racism and xenophobia glaring, a passage or two that put the spotlight on the absolutism of a Moroccan state inhuman and expeditious in managing the migration from sub-Saharan Africans? What happened to that article, offered as an immediate reading the tradition of the site, sees suddenly move elsewhere? What is the meaning and scope of the note Mrax accompanying our article, the one from elsewhere: "This position reflects the views of its authors? While the authors are engaged! But was it the elaborate, without it being intercepted flying the presence of the institutional gaze need calming. Is to never lose the honor of a brigaded editorial direction?
The other red line on criticism of the new term that we want to teach us absolutely no instructions: Islamophobia. The approach to analyze the contours become by force of circumstance must fail (and we showed why), has earned our article, a diatribe from one of your members on your actual site itself ... If your association allows this speech in his breast - (In the sense that not distanced by the famous record of Mrax "This position reflects the author's remarkable is) - we can expect to steamroller that crushes the doctrinaire and prohibited.
Therefore, we need to question these cards below that challenge us, because there may suppress freedom and the real refusal. The Mrax has it lost its autonomy, becoming a branch of the Moroccan state? Does it fit under the umbrella of an ideology that must be hidden acquiesce and bow to deserve the word?
Please, awaiting a definitive response, accept our sincere greetings.
Sam Touzani
Mohammed Belmaïzi
PS: This letter is addressed to the President and Board of Mrax and may at any time apply to the opinion, under the title of Open Letter.
0 comments:
Post a Comment